Archive for January, 2010

Government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth

January 17, 2010

Abraham Lincoln said in his famous Gettysburg Address ,” Government  of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth”.  Well I am afraid he may have been wrong.  We may be in the beginning of a second civil war. Part of our government  (congress) has been slowly  taken over by people who will sell out our country for their own personal gain.    While this  time it is not north versus south it,  like the civil war, it has a lot to do with economics and holding down some people so that other people will get more than their fair share.  Least, I be misunderstood, I am a capitalist.  But what we have now layered on top of our capitalist system is something I term “curuptionalist”.  And it appears that congress, especially the Senate is willing to distroy the future of our country just to maintain the ability to stay in office.  That is why I have suggested term limits in past posts.

But I have given a lot of thought to how we can have a more representative government.  Here is my idea: We now have the technology to vote  directly on any issue. Most of us can use the Internet and even more people can use cell phones and text.  But the problem with having everyone vote directly is that we don’t have the time or even the knowledge on most subjects.  That is where the Proxy comes in.  We can give our vote on a topic or specific bill to a Proxy. The Proxies are subject matter experts.  For instance, you could give your vote on matter’s to do with Climate Change to Tom Friedman if you felt he would represent your point of view.   Anyone not serving in branch of government could become a Proxy.  Proxies could require a small donation for them to represent you or not.  It would depend on their circumstances.  It would be up to the Proxies to market themselves to voters but virial marketing will work well. The whole system would be run by a non profit organization, called ByThePeople.  that would be established with a clear mandate to just administer the process but not take a position on anything else.   All this would be set up outside of our existing governmental and election structure.  Then a new party would be created called the Proxy Party.  Candidates of this party would agree that they would vote with the majority of Proxies on any one bill.  ByThePeople, would operate the system that would provide  the elected individuals with the results of the Proxies.  Proxies would also provide points of view on what should be in bills etc.  Eventually, we will even be able to change some of the senate rules etc.  Members of the existing parties can also sign up to follow the Proxy vote.

OK, I know there are a lot of details to be developed.  And maybe this concept does not really work.  But we certainly have the technology to make it happen.  If any of you have better ideas, please comment.  We need to take back our country.  We need to care about our future and the future of our children and grandchildren.

Rob Glaser steps down: The end of an era

January 14, 2010

Rob Glaser steps down. I have known Rob since in 1992 when we was leading Microsoft’s multimedia business and I was VP of business development at Intel and tasked amongst other things with working with Microsoft and Rob to develop a number of consumer initiatives.  One of these was the interactive set top box which still has not really happened but that project ultimately lead to the the development of the cable modem albeit without Microsoft participation.  I was sorry when Microsoft removed Rob from his position but it ended up being a great thing for Rob who ended up leaving Microsoft and starting Real Networks.  I found Rob very smart, articulate and driven but not an easy man to work with.  I learned a lot from him in those early days of the Internet.  Rob has also been a carrying and responsible person that has contributed much through charity and political work.

What ever you think of Real Networks (I love using its Rhapsody service myself) and what ever you think of Rob, we owe him much as one of the true pioneers of the Internet.  Rob was one of the few (I count myself in this small list) that in the early 90′s understood the power of the Internet and how it would transform traditional media.   Thanks Rob.

Israel leaves the middle east

January 12, 2010

Just read a very good op ed by David Brooks which you can read here. When I was in Israel in May, I was blown away the developments in every area from technology to art. I lived in Israel in the 70s and was one of the first to develop a technology based export business. While I have been back many times, these are different times for Israel. Much of this is due to the increased sense of security that is the the result of the walls built around the border areas. While these walls are there to protect Israel from terrorists (and they have been effective at that) they are a symbol of all that is wrong in the middle east. For not only do they protect Israel but the isolate the Arab countries from all that Israel could have contributed to their development. Israel no longer sees itself as part of the middle east. It is a developed country dealing with other developed countries. Walking around in Tel Aviv is like walking around in parts of LA or Palo Alto. But of course, Israel is located in the middle east. There is no real escape from that. In the meantime I plan to spend many weeks in Tel Aviv this year, proud to be a Jew in a Jewish country and maybe dream a bit about a day when there will be no wall.

The role of the health insurance industry

January 8, 2010

We have a misconception of what the insurance companies job is.  There are two reasons for insurance companies to exist in the current scheme of things.  The first reason is to aggregate risk. That is to share risk amongst a large number of people. This is similar to car insurance or fire insurance.  The second reason is to negotiate with providers for reduced rate that means to represent their members.   It is reasonable that a company doing this should be able to charge a mark up to cover reasonable costs and profit.  The problem is that do to lack of proper regulation the exemption from the anti monopoly laws, insurance companies have decided that their  real service is to provide profits to their owners.

I should say that the idea that everyone pay the same amount does not make sense just as charging driver the same for car insurance without taking into consideration their driving record does not make sense.  That means that the insurance companies are have to decide what is fair to the other members.  But they have distored this role to help them obtain better profits.  They also have to decide what is reasonable medical care under the insurance otherwise some members might abuse the insurance and spend much more than needed.  But frankly, I hate to see a profit based business making these decisions.

To make matter’s even more complicated, we all of an interest in each other’s well fair.  People who are ill cost all of us money in reduced productivity, use of other services etc.

It appears that our government thinks they can improve things by adding some additional regulations.  I doubt that will work.   I believe the concept of medical insurance is a bad idea in these times.

I believe that we need a single payer system even with all the problems that will bring that is not tied to profit making.   We need to do the following:

  • Establish a single payer system  (by slowly increasing those that can be on Medicare)
  • Abolish the employer based medical insurance structure which will improve the competativness of our industries
  • Provide a tax credit to every family to cover the amount presently needed to provide reasonable health insurance.  This money will not have to be used for health insurance.  The government will pay for all costs above this for on a reasonable basis (difficult topic which needs more work).
  • The government must invest substantially more in medical research (take the money from defense  since we have the larges force in the world by a factor of twenty and one of the worse health outcomes of any developed country).
  • The government must invest in education and other actions that can effect life style

Our cousins the Neanderthals

January 3, 2010

I just listened to a really interesting Podcast from Scientific America.  It was about the Neanderthals.  It was fascinating to me.  I guess we have learned so much about the people in the last few years do to our ability to sequence their genes which was done just last year.  We now know that the Neanderthal was not a sub set of Homo Sapiens but rather broke off from a common ancestor as early as a million years ago.  Neanderthals left Africa much earlier than our ancestors.  The were there about 600,000 years ago while our ancestors left only about 60,000 years ago.  Neanderthals and our ancestors could not intermix in that they could not produced children together. Who knows if under certain circumstances they had sex although they probably were not that attactrive to each other.  Neaderthals lived until about 30,000 years ago. They probably went extent because of changes in weather (ice age stuff) and perhaps competition with  our ancestors who were in the more southern parts of Europe and Asia at the time.  While the Neanderthals had brains as large or even larger than ours,  and their tools (technologogy) was not as sufficicated as ours.  For instance, our ancestors had niddles and could sow clothes together while the Neaderthals could only fasen clothing together.  They probably had some form of language.  It is interesting to imagine what would have happened if they had survived.  Would we have lived side by side with them?  Would parts of the world be dominated by Neanderthals?  Or would they have eventually driven us to extentsion?
And a final thought, it is pretty clear that intelligent life as represented by Homo Sapiens is not unique to just us.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 284 other followers