Ken Olsen, the founder of Digital Equipment died yesterday at the age of 84. He was a special and I would say even extraordinary person who had a great impact on the computer industry and on me personally. I would not be the same person I am if it was not for Ken. I was a 35 year old engineering manager when I meet him for the first time and began to work with him closely for a number of years. Ken was just 54 just a year younger than Steve Jobs is now. It was not always an easy relationship but it as always intense, often exciting and often scary. My small part of the Ken Olsen story is describe in this book. When I meet Ken, in 1980, he was no longer really able to manage the company he had created. There was a lot of in fighting amongst his various senior managers of the company. But more importantly, the computer world was about the change and change for good and in ways that Ken could not conceive. Digital was the 2nd largest computer company in the world and the leader in mini computers. I remember in 1980, Mike Scott who was present of Apple came to visit with us. A year later, we had a visit from Bill Gates. That was the same year that IBM introduced the PC. Who would have imagined that Compaq Computer which was founded in 1982 would end up acquiring Digital in 1998. I and a number of other, like Barry Folsom, tried to help Digital move into the next phase of computing but we failed partly because we go it wrong and partly because the company could not make the transition. Ken was forced out of Digital in 1992. He was 66 years old. Just my age now. I can’t imagine how he must have felt. Most likely (and also sadly), Jobs will be probably not be at Apple when he is 66.
I want to pay my respect to Ken. He was a sweet man in many ways. I am grateful for the things he taught me and the opportunities he gave me. I imagine the years after he left Digital were difficult for him. I had no contact with him personally after I left Digital in March of 1983.
Archive for the ‘Technology’ Category
Goodbye Ken Olsen
February 7, 2011Sony and Apple
February 2, 2011There was an interesting article comparing Sony and Apple. I saw the relationship here especially during the time of Akio Morita (who also had to step down because of illness although he was much older than Jobs). Then came Idei whom I actually knew (I meet him several times when he was head of marketing and later when we was CEO). He was a marketing guy without much vision or ability to focus the company. And now we have Howard Stringer who is trying but does not have the capacity. I believe that Sony should broken up. At one time, I had suggested that Apple consider buying the company and breaking it up. This was before their major successful with the iPhone and iPad and when Sony’s brand was stronger than Apples. In retrospect, it was a dumb idea since it would have been a major distraction.
The interesting thing here is what will happen when, Job’s leadership is no longer. Sadly, we will probably not have to wait very long to find out.
Leadership, Vision and Steve Jobs
January 19, 2011Born to blast
December 5, 2010I just came back from a three day trip to Silicon Valley. I rarely visit Silicon Valley ever since that day in April 1999 when I turned in my badge at Intel and drove to my new home in San Francisco. My primary reason for the trip was to see my dad who lives in Santa Clara and to visit with my eldest son and his family. I gave my dad who is 87 some advanced lessons on how to use Facebook. That evening I celebrated the first day of Hanukkah with two of my grandsons. We lite the candles to celebrate an event that happened 2200 years ago in the heart of a community at has an attention span measured in milliseconds. By the way, the next night at an Intel Alumni event (more on that later), I celebrated the second night of Hanukkah with a few Jewish friends via an iPhone app called iMennorah.
I stayed at the Four Seasons Hotel in East Palo Alto. It was the first time in eleven years that I spent a night in Palo Alto, a town where I lived for eleven years before leaving Intel. The Four Seasons is built in an area which had been previously called Whiskey Gulch which was al two block area located in the small part of East Palo Alto which was on the “right” side of the Freeway, i.e. the Palo Alto side. Whiskey Gulch was named that way because in the past their was a rule in Palo Alto was dry and no alcohol could be sold. I got involved twice with East Palo Alto. One in the summer of 1966 when I lived there as part of a program to coach high school kids that were going to be allowed to go to Universities without having the actually grades and skills. The second time was in 1992 when Bart Decrem started PluggedIn. East Palo Alto had one of the highest murder rates in the USA at this time. It was a small disenfranchised enclave in the middle of the wealth and education of Silicon Valley. Most people living in Palo Alto only thought of East Palo Alto as the place where the maids and gardeners came from. I lived in Palo Alto by the way. Domino’s Pizza refused to deliver in East Palo Alto. Around 1992, I became the first chair of the PluggedIn board and served proudly in that capacity for seven years. We had a lot of success in up lifting the community. We helped some of the kids start up business. My son, Asher (now Executive Director of the Post Carbon Institute) worked with Pluggedin to create a network for the citizens of East Palo Alto called EPA.net which is still functioning. But now part of the community we tried to build was gone and replaced with a hotel and a number of office buildings. In fact, I had a meeting the next day with my tax adviser and financial managers in one of those buildings. How ironic and a bit sad. Then I meet with the Executive Director of Equal Access and organization that is helping tens of millions of people in rural Asia and Africa. I am a senior advisor to this organization. Somehow on about five million dollars a year we can change the lives of so many people.
I also had several meetings with old friends that are involved in high tech investing. Speaking with my VC friends, I heard a lot of stories about crazy valuations including companies that refused significant offers only to have go out of business few months later. Then I read this story. It kind of reminds me of the Gold Rush days with Sailors jumping ship to rush up to the gold fields. Most found nothing and those that fund gold were soon separated from their tursures. It was the people supplying the miners that made the money.
Later that evening I went to an Intel Alumni event. It was attended by almost 200 people many of which had been at Intel from the 70s or like me from the 80s. Andy Grove even attended. I moderated a panel dealing with early stage companies both from the perspective of the entrepreneur and the venture investor. The questions we explored where what were the skills we learned at Intel that helped us as entrepreneurs are as venture investors and what were the things we did not learn at Intel that hindered us. I plan to post on what we discussed that evening later. But at this event where people who started young and grew old working for one company over more than 30 years in some cases. And working for a company the changed the world. And while I am disappointed in what happened later at Intel, the company that is still the leading semi conductor company in the world. What a different experience these people had to those working for the current crop of start ups.
Mark Zuckerberg smarter than I thought
September 26, 2010I don’t know Zuckerberg and I have yet to see the movie. My sense of him was that he was rather unsophisticated in financial matters (and certainly legal ones). But now that I understand the “100 million dollar donation”, my opinion has changed.
First of all before I become to cynical, I want to applaud anyone that does anything to help our young people get a reasonable education. And I also want to acknowledge any wealthy person that gives substantial money to charity.
So Zuckerberg, is not really giving 100 million dollars. No he is donating the equivalent of 100 million dollars in Facebook Stock. Assuming that FB stock keeps its valuation (I have big doubts about that personally), it will cost him about 30 million dollars. He does not have to pay capital gains on this stock and he will get a deduction from federal and state tax. I believe he is putting this money into a non profit he set up an will control. He is probably requiring Newark to meet certain criteria before they get the money (not sure how he turns the stock into cash). Since he controls the non profit, I think, he can always donate the money someplace else if Newark does not perform. And he locks in about a 100 million dollar donation which will help pay the tax on future sales of stock albeit maybe with a lower valuation. This is a very smart strategy and one that I have personally used but of course at a different scale. He must be getting good tax advice. Of course, maybe FB stock will be worth a lot more in the future but then he has so much more of that. And look at the great free PR.
Ok, I said I would be cynical. I hope it turns out to a be a win win. Newark actually gets the money and does something with it and Zuckerberg gets to leverage the taxes. One thing is pretty funny, via this method, California is actually giving a 10 million dollar donation to Newark schools.
Intel secures its future (maybe)
August 23, 2010Intel recently acquired (subject to approval) McAfee one of the leading (but not leader) in the area of computer security. The is a well thought out article in Forbes by Ed Sperling which you can read here. I have been reading a lot of article criticizing this move my former employer. As readers of this blog know I am often critical of Intel. Frankly, I think the company has displayed a lack of leadership (sorry Paul) and has been going sideways for the last ten years or so (ever since I left some may say…joke). I believe that security and protection is both an opportunity for Intel and by its absence a limitation to Intel and all the other computer companies. I don’t mean just protection for virus and hacking or even content protect. I personally have a much broader view of this which I will write about when I finally finish “Ten Trends for Ten Years” a project I am working on for myself.
I remember getting Intel to put in a processor ID which meant that each processor was unique. I saw how this could be used to provide protection but when customers found out about it, they screamed. They thought we were going to use it to track what they were doing. I wish I could remember when this happened and which processor. I know this happend again in 1999 but I am pretty sure this was the second time. Later, at what is now Intel Capital, I invested in in RSA. Sometime later, we made the first investment in Verisign. I saw Verisgn as a very important ingredient in making the internet safe for commerce. I think we invested just a million or so and sold our interest later for 100s of millions. But Intel did not take advantage of our special relationship with Verisign unfortunately.
About three years ago I had an opportunity to share some of my thinking with a senior members of Intel’s management about strategies that could be taken to increase growth. One of the things I pushed was security. I doubt that my suggestions had anything to do with their decision. They stopped listening to me the day I walked out the door or even earlier. But I am happy the reach the same conclusion.
Now I hope that they can make the acquisition a success. The will be a tall order. It is very hard to make acquisitions work and especially difficult for companies like Intel that are very internally focused. But Renee James who will be the responsible person at Intel for McAfee is a very capable and if anyone there can make it work, she can. I wish her luck.
Andy Grove: Only half right
July 7, 2010Andy wrote an article about job creation or the lack of said recently. I think Andy is totally right that high tech start ups are not the answer to domestic job creation. Large scale job creation for high tech can only happen if there is local manufacturing and I do not see that in the world we now live in. Even software and support services will move abroad if companies are successful although to a smaller degree. It is natural for companies to seek lower cost and we as consumers benefit from that. I was shocked that Andy, felt that taxing products that contained outside labor was a good idea. It is an awful idea in my opinion. First of all that is a tax on US Citizens in that we would have to pay more for products to that we could support American workers but more importantly it could destroy the world economy (if it is not already destroyed by the foolish actions of various governments). And we need to see countries like China, India etc develop for a number of reasons. On the other hand, we should push for fair valuation of Chinese currency, work standards etc.
There are a number of actions our pathetic government (and as always I mean all three branches and both major political parties) could take to increase domestic employment such a major creation of green jobs in both energy creation and most importantly in the short term, energy conservation, the basic problem is that there will not be enough jobs for Americans and we need to build a new model to deal with that. We were once a farming nation. Now we have twice as many people in prison than working on farms. We need to convert our major military industrial complex to creating such things as high speed rail. We need to make our education system work so that we create even more knowledge workers. There should be two years of nation service young people. These are just a few ideas. But most importantly, employment will stay high and we will get use to it. It is awful of course for those that are unemployed but we will not help them with taxes on imports.
Adobe reborn (at least for me)
May 6, 2010I was able to share my earlier post which also went on to Facebook and Twitter about a very unfortunate experience with Adobe with a senior executive at that company. I knew that if it was my company, I would want to know. This resulted in a call by an executive who was very concerned about what we had experience and wanted to understand in detail so that he could take measures to improve things. I was very happy to hear that the update that my wife received which stopped her CS3 from working on Snow Leopard was not intentional. It was just a security fix that somehow had this result.
While I do think Adobe has a number of issues in their customer interface, there willingness to hear about the issue and take corrective actions speaks well for that company.
