Two Thirds Done

Thoughts and experiences of an eighty one year old Wild Duck.

Avram Miller by the sea
EN | IT

587 posts since 2006

Tag: Intel Capital

  • Why Did Intel Capital Fail to Influence Intel’s Strategy

    I just read a very well-written article about this question, which you can read here. https://globalventuring.com/corporate/information-technology/how-intel-lost-touch-with-its-investment-arm/

    It begins with the question: How could Intel Capital, a world-leading investment unit, have created more than $170 billion in market value from investing in more than 1,800 companies, and still not be able to steer its parent through market disruptions?

    Reading the article was a bit of a punch in my stomach. Intel Capital was formally created in 1991. Prior to that, I had been doing a combination of M&A and early-stage investing. It had become clear to me that acquiring companies was not going to work out, as the Intel immune system would attack any foreign object, and I was concentrating on early stage. I had built a small group. Les Vadasz, who was my boss the entire time I was at Intel—and my mentor, and importantly, my friend—was asked by Andy Grove to focus on early-stage investments.

    (more…)
  • Intel Capital: A Financial Success and a Strategic Failure-A Point of View from the Co-Founder

    When Les Vadasz and I started Intel Capital in 1991 (I had already been doing minority investments since 1988), we had three objectives:

    1. Provide strategic insight that would support the long-term plans of the company
    2. Grow the current business
    3. Realize an adequate financial return

    We believed, correctly, that by working with early-stage companies we could gather important insight into future opportunities and challenges. That part was true, but our inability to use this information to inform Intel’s long term plans meant that little strategic value was actually received.

    We were definitely able to help grow the current business. The example I like to use (probably because I led this activity) was driving the creation of residential broadband, which played an extremely important role in making the personal computer the interactive device in the home.

    We wanted to get a good enough return that we would not be constantly under the eye of the finance people. Instead, we made billions and became one of the most successful venture groups in the world and the leader in corporate venture capital.

    Les and I did not think of ourselves as venture capitalists. We originally called the group Corporate Business Development (CBD). Les Vadasz’s title was Senior Vice President and Director of Corporate Development, while my title was Vice President of Business Development.

    CBD was rebranded as Intel Capital after I left in 1999. I think the focus of Intel Capital really changed when Arvind Sodhani took the helm in 2005. Prior to that, Arvind was Intel’s Treasurer.  While he had a strong background in finance he had no understanding of technology. 

    In the 90s, Les and I  recognized the importance of the Internet, but Intel was stuck in the PC era and would not change. It pretty much missed every major change in the computer industry since.

    One of the lessons I learned from both my time at Digital Equipment Corporation and then Intel is that it is more important what you do in the good days than how you react to the bad days that follow. Thinking that today will last forever is the curse of successful companies.  I fear that Apple is now in the mode.  

    The latest  major change in the computer industry that Intel missed was AI and its relationship to GPUs (graphics processors). In addition, the company, which had been the leader in semiconductor process technology, lost that leadership position.

    I wonder if the old CBD would have seen it coming. I am sure that even if we did, we would have had no impact on the company’s strategy. Andy Grove set into motion a series of increasingly poor choices in CEOs. Not one of them had a strategic bone in their bodies.

    Let’s hope the new guy, Lip-Bu Tan, can figure out what to do to save Intel—if it can be saved.

    In the meantime, Intel is spinning out Intel Capital as an independent entity. Just what the world needs: another venture capital firm.

  • Intel recently announced it is spinning out Intel Capital.

    Les Vadasz and I co-founded Intel Capital in 1991. Les had hired me in 1984, and he was the only person I reported to during my 15 years at Intel. He was among the original 12 people who started Intel, appearing as employee #3. Sadly, he is the only one of that group who is still alive. Les and I met a few weeks ago when I was in California visiting friends and family. He was my mentor, partner, and remains my friend.

    Initially, Intel Capital was named Corporate Business Development (CBD). It wasn’t renamed to Intel Capital until after I left in 1999. In fact, I started the precursor to CBD in 1988, reporting to Les. I had a small group focused on minority investments and M&A. At the time, my focus was more on M&A, as I wanted to expand Intel’s business into areas like communications, networking, and graphics.

    After several attempts to acquire networking companies—Cisco was deemed too expensive, and 3Com was “too screwed up,” according to Andy Grove—I came to the conclusion that we couldn’t afford the companies we liked, and we didn’t like the ones we could afford. Watching what happened to the few companies we did acquire also taught me a valuable lesson: Intel’s culture was so strong and insular that it would reject acquisitions like “antibodies attacking a foreign object.” This led me to shift the focus toward early-stage companies.

    By 1991, both Andy Grove (then CEO) and Les concluded there was significant benefit in taking minority investments, not just in early-stage companies but also in more mature ones. Andy asked Les to take overall responsibility for these activities (Les was one of the most senior executives at Intel) and probably added something like, “And keep Avram under control.”

    Les and I worked together to define the role of CBD/Intel Capital. We settled on three major objectives:

    1. Investments that would grow Intel’s current business: A great example was my leadership in developing residential broadband, which played a major role in driving the home computer market for PCs.

    2. Gaining strategic insights to guide Intel’s future business plans: Unfortunately, we had limited success here—not because we didn’t gain insights, but because we couldn’t exert enough influence within Intel to act on them.

    3. Achieving reasonable financial returns: We knew we had to be profitable quickly, or Intel’s “bean counters” would make our lives miserable. On this front, we exceeded all expectations. We made buckets of money. By the time I left, Intel Capital had $9 billion in assets (mostly from gains) and had already taken about $3 billion off the table.

    We didn’t operate like a traditional venture capital group. No one had carry-interest. Compensation was the same as for the best of Intel’s employees: salary, bonuses, and stock options. Les and I were well-compensated, though we could have made more as partners in a VC firm. However, making money wasn’t our primary driver; we believed deeply in Intel. Those who worked for us didn’t fare as well financially, as they didn’t benefit as much from stock options. Still, many learned the trade and eventually moved on, which we were okay with. Recruiting and training excellent people from within Intel was a core part of what we did.

    Over time, Les expanded his team, and I expanded mine. My efforts were recognized when I was named one of Intel’s 33 corporate officers, a milestone I achieved thanks to Les and Andy’s support.

    After Les retired in 2003, Arvind Sodhani, Intel’s former Treasurer, took over Intel Capital. From what I understand, Arvind focused more on returns on investment than on the broader strategic impact of the group. However, I can’t say for sure—I wasn’t there.

    I firmly believe corporate venture capital is a strategic function and shouldn’t be driven primarily by financial returns.

    Intel is going through tough times now, and it’s unclear if the company can survive. This is the result of a series of bad decisions, particularly in the selection of CEOs, starting with Craig Barrett in my opinion. Intel’s board has been one of the worst I’ve ever observed, and this decline started when Andy Grove became chairman.

    Spinning out Intel Capital is likely the right decision given Intel’s current situation. Nevertheless, it makes me sad.

  • My book is now available on Amazon, Apple and Barnes, and Noble.

    My book is now available on all formats at Amazon, Apple Books, and Barnes and Noble.  I have gotten great feedback from those that have read it.  If you are not one, please buy my book and even more importantly read it.  Thanks.

    Amazon

    Apple

    Barnes and Noble

    It has been on Amazon for three months so there are many positive reviews there to read.

  • The Future History of Technology

    The book I am probably not going to write

    From time to time, I think about writing a book on the evolution of information technology. 

    I am designing it in my head.  Sometimes it is divided into three sections, which are simply the past, present and future. Frankly, I am not that interested in the present. I love writing about the history of the computer industry since I have been around a long time and I was present for most of it.  I also have a lot of  anecdotes to share. However, it is the future that has always claimed my attention since I have been a child.

    Many of you know that I was a very successful venture capital investor when I was Corporate Vice President of Business Development and Co Founder of Intel Capital. In fact, during my tenure, we were the most successful corporate venture investors, and maybe the most successful venture group over all. There were many others, especially Les Vadasz, that contributed to that accomlishment.  I have written a great deal about that and there a many articles, interviews and even videos discussing those times which seem so long ago and will not go much into that here.

    How to invest: Let me count the ways

    There are different styles of venture investing.  Many venture capitalists bet on the team.  In fact, the core competency of many of the most successful VCs is identifying the right CEO.  Frankly, I am not that good at identifying the best talent. What I focused on was determining the right areas in which to invest.  I called them “neighborhoods”which were really  business disruptions caused by changes in technologies.  A great example was the impact on the media industry resulting from digital distribution of content direct to consumers (iTunes), a disruption that is still going on.  Another is the impact of the internet on retail distribution (Amazon).  A very recent example is the impact the “sharing” economy (AirBnB) is having on the hotel industry.

    My talent was in identifying these opportunities well in advance of others.  In fact, I would often be too early.  The book that I will probably never write, will deal extensively with how I was able to identify these “neighborhoods.”  It is not something I fully understand myself.  I am also not sure if I am still able to do this.  I certainly no longer had the considerable resources that I had when I was at Intel.  By the way, my current focus is on the impact of technology on direct to consumer health care.

    The impact of high-speed residential broadband

    From about 1993 to 1999 (when I left Intel), one of my tasks was not just investing in the opportunities but helping others understand as well. That was one of the reasons I would write articles and speak at conferences of what would have been considered at the time, untreated  industries.  At first, it would seem strange that an executive from a Semi Conductor company would give a key-note address at the National Association of Broadcasters but in retrospect it all made sense.

    My job at Intel was strategic.  It was to create opportunities for intel by growing the market of PCs and as a result, the market for Intel chips.  Venture Investing was a tool for accomplishing this but had a secondary benefit of earning billions of dollars of profit for Intel.  Using some of this profit, I was able to use to fund very important initiatives like the creation of residential broadband which in turn created new investment opportunities.

    I recently came across an article I wrote for Advertising Age in 1996 (about three years from the first deployment by Intel of Cable Modems with Comcast and Viacom (who had a cable business at the time.)

    When you read it, please keep in mind this was written 21 years ago. Imagine you are in 1996 and have the point of view reflected in the article and the opportunity to invest in early stage companies.  You can see, that it might not be so surprising that Intel was able to get such great returns from its venture investments.

    TECHNOLOGY MARKETING;  COMPUTERS LEARNING USERS’ PREFERENCES–AND ADVERTISING WILL GROW MORE SELECTIVE

    By Avram Miller. Published on November 11, 1996 by Advertising Age

    Twenty-five years ago, the microprocessor was invented. The first microprocessors were simple devices when compared to the advanced capabilities of today’s products. At that time, it was impossible to imagine that these devices would evolve into the engines of the Information Age.

    In 1965, Gordon Moore, the co-founder, and chairman of Intel Corp., accurately predicted that the capabilities of semiconductor devices (of which the microprocessor is one) would double every 18 months.

    MOORE’S LAW

    Following that prediction, known as Moore’s Law, this would mean that a microprocessor’s capabilities would result in a tenfold increase over five years or a 100-fold increase in 10 years.

    Since its inception, the microprocessor has had an amazing impact on many aspects of our lives. However, it is in its role as the brains of the personal computer where this has been most evident. Since the introduction of the PC in the early 1980s, we have witnessed an explosive growth in the use of computers, and have seen the computer expand from a central information facility to become the primary desktop tool of most business professionals.

    In the last several years, we also have seen it become a major consumer product. About 40% of American homes now have purchased one or more PCs. While many industries have been completely transformed by the PC, its impact on the advertising industry has been mostly limited to a tool for production and business management. This is about to change in a fundamental way.

    The personal computer is rapidly becoming a new medium for information, entertainment, education, and commerce. The microprocessors now in development by Intel continue the pace of Moore’s Law and will greatly enhance the PC.

    Advanced video, audio and graphics capabilities will provide a powerful environment for media. Advances in communications technology over transports such as phone lines and satellites will greatly increase the access to media. The rapid growth of the Internet (itself fueled by the microprocessor) will combine with the PC to create one of the most powerful mediums for communications even known: the connected PC. And in becoming a new medium, it will have a profound impact on the ad industry, advertisers, and their customers.

    There is a lot of discussion about advertising on the Internet. Some believe the role of advertising will be limited. Reasons for this belief include the limited size of the consumer market for Internet-connected PCs, the lack of compelling content, poor measurement systems, and privacy issues. Many believe the power in this new medium is its ability to target audiences even down to the individual-the promise of one-to-one marketing in the extreme.

    NO OVERNIGHT ACTION

    While we cannot expect to see a total restructuring overnight, the history of the PC teaches that its impact will happen faster and more powerfully than most expect. Hundreds of venture-capital-backed companies and most of the leading technology companies are working to make the PC a powerful vehicle for advertisers to reach customers.

    Further, we are seeing the emergence of a new generation of consumers raised on interactivity, which is one of the most compelling attributes of the PC. As several studies show, members of Generation X are voting with their eyeballs as they spend more and more time using their computers and less time watching television.

    The relevance of advertising will be significantly enhanced as PCs learn about their users’ preferences and select the most appropriate advertising. We will see a separation of advertising and programming so that customers may actually subscribe to advertising and use “coupons” to pay for programming (see http://www.cybergold.com for an example).

    Ads will no longer be limited by time and space. Customers will choose to interact with advertising that truly assists them in making decisions. Not only will ads be more pertinent, customers will be able to order products while interacting with these ads, thereby increasing the value of the experience.

    Currently, advertising on the connected PC suffers from poor production values. This results from the combination of limited communications bandwidth (the speed of sending information to the computer) and the inability to assemble the advertisement in advance of its use.

    RANDOM BROWSERS

    Consumers typically browse the World Wide Web on the Internet in a somewhat random fashion. When they reach a destination, small advertisements known as banners are displayed. In order not to introduce delays in a medium that currently is slow, (because of limitations of the communications links), the audio-visual quality of the ad is not compelling.

    However, new techniques are about to be introduced that will allow rich audio-visual advertisements to be placed in advance on the consumer’s PC and called up at the appropriate time. This means that in addition to a high degree of customer relevancy, ads can be exceptionally entertaining. These Internet commercials will take advantage of high-resolution video, high-fidelity audio, and advanced 3D graphics to truly exploit the capabilities of the connected PC to deliver compelling advertising.

    Avram Miller, VP of business development for Intel Corp., is charged with establishing strategic alliances for the advancement of PC technology and the growth of new media. Before joining Intel, he was president of Franklin Computer Corp. and a group manager at Digital Equipment Corp.

  • The birth of Intel Capital

    Intel Capital

    Intel Capital the Top Venture Capitalist

    Intel Capital was named the number one venture capital “firm” for 2012 by PrivCo.

    I feel proud  of this accomplishment because I consider myself a co-founder of Intel Capital along with Les Vadasz. But then again, it is a bit difficult to accept that Intel Capital could be so successful without me😃.

    So this seems to be an appropriate moment to document the early years of Intel Capital. Clearly this will be my perspective. I am sure that I will remember something incorrectly so let me apologize up front.

    Avram Joins Intel

    I joined Intel in August 1984 after being pushed out of Franklin Computer Company where I served as President and Chief Operating Officer (but in reality, I was pretty much the CEO).  Franklin sold an  Apple II clone and was growing faster than Compaq which offered an IBM PC Clone.  We did about eighty million dollars in sales in our first year of operation but then Apple was able to successfully crush us via litigation.  I won’t go into the details of what happened at Franklin.  I have written about it else where in this blog.  However, it is interesting to note that the key backer of the company, Jim Simon, graciously suggested to me at a dinner the two of us were having, that Franklin and I might both be better off if I resigned.  We both recognized that while I might have done a great job growing the company, I was not equipped to deal with the major capital crunch that resulted from the Apple Litigation (our IPO was pulled and our bank line of credit cancelled).  Jim went on to be one of the top Hedge Fund managers and is worth many billions these days.  One of the other board members, Howard Morgan, a former Professor, who played a major role in recruiting me from Digital Equipment to Franklin, is the General Partner of First Round Capital.

    A few months after leaving Frankin, I was contacted by Intel and asked if I might be interested in joining the company.  An Intel employee named Mike Richmond (I owe him a great deal) had read about me and for reasons I still do not understand, thought I was the kind of person that Intel needed.  He discussed me with Les Vadasz, (badge number three) who at that time was the head of what was called the Corporate Strategic Staff.  Les was a change agent at Intel.  His role in the success of Intel is terribly under appreciated.  It was Les for instance that got Intel into the Micro Processor business.

    I spent three days interviewing at Intel including an interview with Gordon Moore who was CEO, Andy Grove who was COO and many of the very top executives.  My position was “strategic hire”.  That mean that there was no specific job in mind but they wanted me to join Intel.

    Avram’s Early Years at Intel

    Since I came from the computer industry and not from the semi conductor industry, there was a major gap between my knowledge and capabilities and that of the other senior people.  I decided to work out of the Intel facilities in Oregon because it had a small group that actually did computer systems of various sorts called “The System Group”.  I reported solid line to Les Vadasz and dotted line to the Vice President that headed the System Group, Bill Latttin  Interestingly, the CFO of the Group was Andy Bryant, the current Chair of the Intel Board of Directors.

    I spent the next 3 1/2 years working on a number of projects that were systems related.  The most important one was BiiN, a joint venture with the Sieman’s Corporation.  Frankly, none of my accomplishments during those three years were very significant.  I was not very happy with my choice to have gone to work at Intel.  The company itself was not doing so well. It was primarily a memory component company and the Japanese were putting a lot of pricing pressure on the company. Having put my family through a lot of pain by leaving Digital Equipment Corporation and moving them to Pennsylvania so I could work at Franklin, I was was committed to making my Intel job a success.

    Somehow, my work was appreciated. Once the joint venture was put together, I was was offered an opportunity to relocate to Silicon Valley and work out of the same building as Les, Gordon and Andy.  Andy was now CEO.  Paul Otellini, the current CEO was actually his technical assistant (the guy who made the powerpoint presentations).  This was actually one of the key “executive training” positions.

    Pre CBD Days

    It was agreed that I would work primarily on Corporate Development  which initially meant M&A, joint ventures, strategic partnerships and minority investments.  By then, Les  had taken over the System Group from Bill Lattin who left the company.  The System Group was focused on becoming a major OEM supplier of PC’s to companies such as AT&T. In addition to being the head of the System Group, Les continued to have me report to him. Initially I focused on on M&A opportunities.

    The primary area I wanted to focus on was networking technologies.  This was was a field I loved and still love.  I was convinced that the growth of computing would depend on the development of network technology.  I started developing relationships with a number of the Intel board members and had an opportunity to meet with the board on several occasions which was a bit unusual at Intel.  I remember giving a presentation about networking in which I used the automobile industry as an analogy.  I explained how the gas companies were the ones that really pushed the development of  the highway systems by building small demonstration “highways” and providing free maps, etc.  The highway system was like networks and the cars were like the computers in my model.  I explained that once the highways were built and laws were created to limit the driving speed, the auto industry found itself competing with racing stripes, car seat fabric and bumpers.  A number of the board members at that time actually understood more about computer systems than did the management of Intel. This included Max Palesvsky (an amazing man) who was the founder of Scientific Data Systems.

    I wanted to buy Cisco or 3Com but they were too expense for Intel  so I ended up buying a small networking company called Jupiter Technologies who was lead by Jim Flash, now a partner at Accel.  Later, we acquired a company called Lan Systems which was lead by Tyron Pike.  It was very hard to acquire companies.  The companies we wanted, we could not afford (or at least our board did not think so) and the companies we could afford, we did not want.  I thought that by acquiring some smaller companies, we could both get some critical technical skills  as well as  entrepreneurial management which would help Intel create its own  networking business.  That did not work out at all. The Intel anti-bodies attacked  the foreign  objects and the reaction systems took over.  The management of the companies did not really want to be part of Intel and they took off having accomplished little to help Intel develop a Networking Business.

    I was slowly learning that M&A would not work at Intel.  It was also clear to me that Joint Ventures were like running in a three legged raced with lots of coordination and little speed.   Strategic partnerships could be useful but they were typically short lived with the exceptions of the symbiotic relationship represented by Intel and Microsoft.   That pretty much left me with exploring minority investments.

    David Yoffie, a well known professor at the Harvard Business School,  was an advisor to Intel and then joined the Intel Board in 1989.  David and I would discuss these issues a great deal.  My thinking evolved and I realized that minority investments could both provide Intel with strategic insight and market impact without the issues of integration.  So I started proposing minority investments. Later when we understood what we were doing better, we called them venture investments.  I am not sure what the first investment was.  It might have been Digital F/X, which was lead by my friend, Steve Mayer (the co founder of Atari). The very successful venture firm of  Kleiner Perkins also invested. Vinod Khosla was that firms board member. I had a small staff. At the same time,   Harold Hughes, the treasurer of Intel, was also interested in making minority investments.  Tom Galvin worked for him and did some investments in semi conductor technology, I believe, but that activity kind of died out after a while.

    In the meantime, I continued to make small investments.  Les was able to get Andy to allocate $5,000,000 for minority investments.  Andy himself would attend the meetings where the investments were approved. Frankly, he was not that constructive and after awhile, Les was able to convince him that he probably had better things to do with his time.

    Les Goes on Sabbatical 

    Things were not going so well for Les as head of the System Group.  Les went off to take a sabbatical where he taught at Harvard.  Frank Gill took over.  While Frank and I had a good personal relationship, he had no use for my little venture activity.  In fact, he kind of thought it was not ok to earn money via minority investments.  He was thinking of letting me go.  Thank God there was another senior member of Andy’s staff, Dick Boucher, who was willing to take me and my group on while Les was away.

    When Les came back about a year later, he and Andy decided that Les should focus primarily on venture investments.  So Les created a group called Corporate Business Development or CBD.  For a while, I was the only one reporting to Les and I continued to grow my group.  Les and I had a great relationship (although there had been one rocky moment).  Les was a Senior Vice President and I was a Vice President.  I felt that we were partners and we were indeed as well as friends.  We are still friends.

    CBD Established

    As our activities increased, I wanted to focus primarily consumer computing and networking.  In 1992, I had come to the realization that the combination of home computers and high speed residential networks would become a new medium.  I had funded the Intel Architectural  Labs to develop what became today’s cable modem and DSL technologies.  I wanted to invest in every aspect of what it would take to make that happen.  Meanwhile, Les began to hire people who reported directly to him to deal with enterprise computing, semi conductors  technology and even health.

    My group continued to expand.  As the internet took off, the value of our investments increased significantly.  My group alone was sitting on many billions of dollars of  unrealized gains.

    We invested very early in companies like Broadcast.com (Mark Cuban), Verisign, Broadcom, Launch Media, Geocities, Cnet,  and Covad. Later, we invested in CMGI and PCCW.  We also invested in a lot of failures such as American Cybercast and 911 Music. The losers did not cost us much and the winners made up for the losses more than a thousand times.  We passed on a number of companies that became very successful. Probably the most notable was Netscape.  We had an opportunity to invest when that company soon after it was formed in 1994 had pre-money valuation of eighteen million dollars.  Both Les and I thought it was too expensive.  About a year later, it went public with a valuation of $2.9 billion dollars. We also had a chance to invest in Akamai in 1998 which had a valuation of $80 million dollars and went public a year later with a sixteen billion dollar valuation.

    Strategy and Structure

    As the number of deals increased, Les realized we needed to put some structure in place. He set up a formal process for deals with a number of well defined phases.  As part of the process both the treasury dept. at Intel, which was being run by Arvind Sodhani (the President of Intel Capital wince 2005) and the legal dept.,  had to approve the deal.  The job of the treasury dept. was to make sure that we would at least get our money back.  The job of the legal dept.  was to make sure Intel did not get sued.  It was not always a fun process but it worked very well.

    In the beginning we thought the primary benefit to Intel was strategic.  We would have been happy if we just made a bit of money on our investments.  But later, we realized that for a company to have strategic impact (help grow our market), it would have to be very successful and than mean we would receive a substantial return on our investment.  That turned out to be much truer than we could have imagined.

    The Liberty Media of Technology

    As part of the effort to create residential broadband, I had a lot of contact with the cable industry.  John Malone the CEO of TCI (later acquired by AT&T and then acquired by Comcast) was the major player in the cable industry.  John cleverly created another company called Liberty Media which was spun off from TCI in 1991.  Peter Barton was the CEO of the company and John Malone was the Chairman.  Peter and I became good friends partly due to our interest in playing jazz piano.

    Barton created billions of dollars in value with a staff of less than 20 people. They invested in early stage cable network companies such as BET, Starz, The Discovery channel, etc.  They could then make sure these companies were successful by getting TCI to carry their programing.  It was really brilliant.

    For about seven years, I would attend the Allen& Company Sun Valley Conference where some of the most important CEOs of entertainment and consumer companies would be.  Andy Grove also went on several occasions. Peter Barton gets it in to his head to try to convince Andy that he should give me a billion dollars or so to invest and create public company that would do for technology companies what Liberty did for cable networks.  The conversation was pretty funny to observe. I don’t think Andy really got it.  He also probably thought that I had put Peter up to it.  Sadly, Peter died in 2002 at the age of 51 from cancer.

    Avram Exits Intel

    In 1996, I was diagnosed with Prostate Cancer and treated in the beginning of 1997.  I had been thinking of leaving Intel and exploring the possibility of starting a leverage buyout company with Dave Roux, a good friend, who was responsible for Business Development at Oracle. There was a good chance I would have gone for it  but once I had been treated for Prostate Cancer,  I decided that I would not want to make a long term commitment to anything.  From that point on I would live my life as if I only had ten years more to live.   Ten years is enough time to accomplish something new like learn a language but it is not so long that one would postpone doing things that were really important.  Dave went on to found Silverlake Partners, which was an out growth of the ideas he and I explored. Silverlake was a fantastic success and I would guess I would have been a very rich man had I joined him in this effort. Fortunately, I have been a limited partner in a number of their funds.

    I did not see myself staying at Intel.  It violated my newly created ten year rule. Les was nine years older than me and would be wanting to retire in the near future.  He retired in 2003. I would have either have gotten his job or they would have put someone else over me. Both would have been awful.  The head of CBD really had to be an inside Intel guy and I was someone that wanted to spend my time outside of the company.  But then my health made the choice for me.  My PSA did not go down after my radiation which is the expected result.  Instead, it stayed the same for almost a year.  My doctor was saying “at least it is not going up”.  Then it started going up slowly.  He would say “well at least it is not going up fast”.  Then it started going up fast. You get the picture.  It was looking like my Prostate Cancer had metastasized which was pretty much a death sentence.  I took a three month sabbatical and then a medical leave of absence. My group was broken up and the people reporting to me went to work for other managers.  I spent my last three months at Intel developing a presentation on how to grow CDB even more and how it could play an even more significant role in the development of Intel.  On my last day at Intel, I presented this at a meeting of top management.  I am sure that no one was really interested and probably did not care that I was leaving because “real men have a P&L and don’t make money by investing”.

    Strategic Impact

    We started CBD which later became Intel Capital to have strategic impact on Intel’s future.  At first we invested in companies that could help our business units grow.  Later, we realized that since Intel had about 85% of the PC microprocessor sales, we could help the company just by growing the over all market.

    My focus was on the consumer market, which when I started, Andy Grove, said did not even exist.  I knew that consumers would need high speed communication just like business.  It was clear to me that combining high speed communications with powerful home computer, would lead to the creating of a new medium for information, education, entertainment and commerce.

    Les totally agreed with this vision.  He allowed me to take some money out of our investment funds to fund the Intel Architecture Labs to develop the technology now used by the cable and phone industries to provide residential broadband. We licensed some of that technology for stock options in various profolio companies and got a good return. But most important, we were able to be the drivers of residential broadband.  That provided a prospect which allowed us to invest in key areas of this new and explosive market which resulted in amazing financial returns.  More importantly, the growth of the consumer market fueled Intel’s growth turning it into one of the most profitable companies in the world by 1999.

    But sadly, Intel did not take the opportunity to expanded it scope of business.  It stayed primarily a microprocessor semi conductor company.  It failed to develop the networking technologies of Broadcom (which we could have acquired).  It failed to develop the communication technologies of Qualcomm (which we could have acquired).

    I often wonder what, if anything, I might have done that might have changed this outcome.  Intel was good to me.  I owe the company a great deal.  I wish I had left it with more.

    The Bubble Bursts 

    One of the hardest things to do was to sell the stock of the companies we invested in even if they were public.  The managers that were responsible for the investments believed in their portfolio companies and wanted to hang on for higher prices.  They were also afraid that Intel selling their stock could undermine the companies and the trust they had with the management of those companies.  I had  a regular quarterly meeting with my staff where I forced decisions to sell stock.  We took billions off the table that way.

    I was no longer at Intel when the Internet bubble burst in the Q1 of 2000.  I don’t know what happened to the the billions of dollars of unrealized investment gain that Intel had.  I am sure billions were wiped out.  Luckily for me, I sold all my tech stocks  in the first quarter of 2000 including all my Intel stock at $72 a share. It has been trading in the$20s ever since.

    CBD become  Intel Capital and Continues

    I don’t really remember when the name  CBD was changed to Intel Capital.  Les was made president of Intel Capital.  Les and I are still close.  He is an amazing man and I owe him much.  He was my teacher in so many ways.  I stayed close to those that worked for me at Intel both while they were at Intel and then after they left.  My wife calls them my “Intel Babies”.

    I left Intel fourteen years ago.  It amazes me that Intel Capital has been about to continue and is clearly a great success.   Much of this must be the result of the strong foundation that Les Vadasz created maybe I deserve a bit of credit too.

    avram in bath