Avram's Past

Living my life in reverse


My professional journey is unfolding in a way that might seem like living life in reverse. I started in medical science and weaved through technology before circling back to healthcare, moving from the USA to the Netherlands, then Israel, back to the USA, then Israel, and now the Netherlands. I went from English to Dutch and Hebrew(struggling) and then back to English, Hebrew (still struggling), and now Dutch.

I embarked on this path at 22 at the Medical University of California, San Francisco. Here, I pioneered technology in neurophysiology utilized in the biofeedback of brain waves, focusing on real-time physiological signal processing—a niche that, at the time, had me as its sole expert.

Later, I  applied technology to problems in diagnosing and treating cardiovascular and pulmonary disease at the Medical School of Erasmus University, Rotterdam, and then the Medical School of Tel Aviv University. During this period, I went from being a research assistant and technician to becoming an associate professor. I also established a business in Israel which commercialized my academic work.

I loved learning and practicing science, but my love of technology animated me the most. My initial career in medical science took me from San Francisco to the Netherlands and then to Israel.  It was an incredible 13-year journey. How could I have known then that I would return to medical science?

In 1978, I made a profound decision to leave the field of medicine. It was a difficult decision.  After all, I had achieved unlikely success from being a merchant seaman sailing on ships in Asia at 18 to an Associate Professor of Medicine by 29. I could not help myself.  I wanted to be part of the computer industry and play a role in shaping its development.  Digital Equipment Corporation offered me a position as the Small Computer Hardware Development Manager in its Central Engineering Organization, and a year later, I was promoted to Group Manager responsible for the Professional Computer Group.  Now, I was back in the USA (Boston Area). 

In 1984, I joined Intel Corporation, eventually becoming one of a few Corporate Officers and serving as Vice President of Corporate Development. In 1992, Les Vadasz and I established Intel Capital, one of the world’s most successful corporate venture groups. 

I left Intel in 1999 to work for my own account, providing strategic advice to public and private companies and serving on several companies’ boards.  In 2017, my wife and I moved to Israel, where we lived until recently.  Then, about ten years ago, I decided to focus my efforts again on the intersection of medicine and technology.  I made several early-stage investments in this area.  My initial focus was on sleep health.  I was one of the first investors in Oura Ring and pulled together much of its initial financing. I became a Senior Advisor to the Cleveland Clinics Research Institute and then worked with Sheba  Hospital in Israel to set up a Longevity Center.  This led me to explore personalized/precision medicine.  I started to learn about AI. It reminded me of fifty years earlier when I held a single transistor in my hand, discovered the concept of software, and learned to program. 

Then, I was granted an opportunity to participate in using AI in health care when I joined the board of Renovaro, which was in the process of acquiring an AI-based cancer diagnostic company (GEDi Cube). I joined Renovaro’s board and moved back to the Netherlands to work closely with the team at what is now called Renovaro AI in Amsterdam. We have moved to Amsterdam, and I go to the company’s offices several times a week.  I am also enjoying speaking Dutch once again.  At 79, I figure I have at least one more act ahead.

Much of what is written here can be read in more detail on in my book, The Flight of a Wild Duck.

6 thoughts on “Living my life in reverse

  1. Hello Avram

    I am always greatly interested by the conclusions you draw from your extensive career in tech (for my part, I went from French civil service to industry to fintech – diverse but less well travelled …)

    I wanted to mention that your mention of Renovaro is a bit perplexing – by habit, I cross-checked what the firm was about and came across the Hindenburg piece as well as the company rebuttal

    I got the impression your name and reputation was being put forward in this rebuttal without providing much in terms of company-specific convincing answers to the issues raised by Hindenburg

    Since you obviously believe in the company’s potential, they should be able to do much better on actual company strengths instead of flaunting your CV !

    By the way, though French national, I am of Dutch origin – maybe a chance to meet in Amsterdam if you are around by late June – early July…

    Wouter van Wijk

    (I currently receive your mails on my personal wouter_vanwijk@yahoo.com mail address)

    Like

    • Thanks for your comments. I don’t agree with you with respect to Renovaro and the Hit Job by Hindenburg. Hindenburg as you probably know a shorter. They manipulate facts with the sole objective to push down a stock. It is hard to respond because everything said feeds the beast. Renovato is doing important work. It’s work that will likely save many lives, perhaps even those at Hindenburg. I should be in Amsterdam at the end of June. Check in with me then.

      Like

      • I know about Hindenburg of course and my point was essentially that your opinion, obviously a strong one, did not come through the way it should – To quote Hindenburg’s legal ‘verbiage’ in the rebuttal should have been irrelevant and emphasis on what actually makes the work at Renovaro ‘important’ would be key

        I am convinced you could find the words without revealing any confidential information – the share price is still suffering over the past month (20 trading days) and some sort of ‘no BS’ response might get the share back on track

        I hope you have a chance to visit the Rijskmuseum while in town…(yes, pretty obvious suggestion)

        Wouter

        Like

    • Thank Kenneth. Please keep in mind that chronological age is just about when you were born and how many years you have been alive. It is not really about the age of your body. Although biological age is on average the same because it is a bell curve. In my case, I am about 3 standard deviations lower. That puts me in less than 1% range. But I think this is not really accurate because we are all going to live longer. The question is not how long but how well. That is why I am working on Longevity as well as disease prevention and therapy, like the work I am doing in cancer. 

      I think we will all need to ask ourselves (hopefully): If I can live to 100 and be healthy and fit, what do I want to do with that time? For me the answer is simple: enjoy life and make a difference.

      Like

Leave a comment